<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286203</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai notes that a lump sum received for giving up manufacturing rights was treated as capital in nature and not taxable as business income. It also records that section 50C was held inapplicable to a pre-insertion transfer approved under Chapter XXC, while the gratuity provision issue was sent back for fresh consideration. The notes further state that contribution to a benevolent fund was allowed outside section 40A(9), deduction under section 80IA was permitted for captive power consumption, and upfront fees, guarantee commission, non-compete fee, and royalty for extraction rights were all treated as revenue or otherwise allowable on the principles applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1388 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286203</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai notes that a lump sum received for giving up manufacturing rights was treated as capital in nature and not taxable as business income. It also records that section 50C was held inapplicable to a pre-insertion transfer approved under Chapter XXC, while the gratuity provision issue was sent back for fresh consideration. The notes further state that contribution to a benevolent fund was allowed outside section 40A(9), deduction under section 80IA was permitted for captive power consumption, and upfront fees, guarantee commission, non-compete fee, and royalty for extraction rights were all treated as revenue or otherwise allowable on the principles applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>