<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21410</link>
    <description>The court clarified that interest charged for non-filing of advance tax statements should be under section 217(1A) and not section 217(1)(a). As the assessee had filed estimates, satisfying the provisions, no interest could be levied under section 217. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the correct application of the Income-tax Act&#039;s provisions and the necessity to align interest charges with legislative requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:48:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21410</link>
      <description>The court clarified that interest charged for non-filing of advance tax statements should be under section 217(1A) and not section 217(1)(a). As the assessee had filed estimates, satisfying the provisions, no interest could be levied under section 217. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the correct application of the Income-tax Act&#039;s provisions and the necessity to align interest charges with legislative requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>