https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392228 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, quashing the erroneous notice issued in Form GST-MOV-10 dated 5th February 2020. The court found the authority's interpretation of Section 129(6) of the Central/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to be incorrect, emphasizing that the applicant had already complied with the court's order regarding tax and penalty deposits. The court highlighted the importance of adherence to court directives and criticized the authority for misconstruing the orders, leading to unnecessary confusion and procedural errors in the case handling. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392228 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, quashing the erroneous notice issued in Form GST-MOV-10 dated 5th February 2020. The court found the authority's interpretation of Section 129(6) of the Central/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to be incorrect, emphasizing that the applicant had already complied with the court's order regarding tax and penalty deposits. The court highlighted the importance of adherence to court directives and criticized the authority for misconstruing the orders, leading to unnecessary confusion and procedural errors in the case handling. Case-Laws GST Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392228