<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 665 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392221</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay but declined interference because the tax effect was below two crores. The special leave petition was dismissed on that ground, reflecting the application of the monetary threshold for tax litigation and leaving the underlying tax dispute undisturbed. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 665 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392221</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay but declined interference because the tax effect was below two crores. The special leave petition was dismissed on that ground, reflecting the application of the monetary threshold for tax litigation and leaving the underlying tax dispute undisturbed. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>