https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392217 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing that the respondents should have responded to the application for the release of seized jewellery made by a family member. The court directed that the petitioners should be allowed to move the application for release, and if rejected, a reasoned order must be provided within four weeks. This decision underscores the importance of timely responses and actions by authorities in cases involving the release of seized assets, ensuring due process and clear communication in such matters. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392217 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing that the respondents should have responded to the application for the release of seized jewellery made by a family member. The court directed that the petitioners should be allowed to move the application for release, and if rejected, a reasoned order must be provided within four weeks. This decision underscores the importance of timely responses and actions by authorities in cases involving the release of seized assets, ensuring due process and clear communication in such matters. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392217