<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 659 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392215</link>
    <description>The Court declared the challenged circular as irrelevant and ultra vires Sections 10(A) and 10(B) of the Income Tax Act. Assessing Officers were directed to conduct assessments in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Yokogawa India Limited, 2017 2 SCC 1. The Writ Petition was allowed with observations, and no costs were awarded, emphasizing judicial decisions&#039; precedence over circulars in interpreting and applying tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 659 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392215</link>
      <description>The Court declared the challenged circular as irrelevant and ultra vires Sections 10(A) and 10(B) of the Income Tax Act. Assessing Officers were directed to conduct assessments in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Yokogawa India Limited, 2017 2 SCC 1. The Writ Petition was allowed with observations, and no costs were awarded, emphasizing judicial decisions&#039; precedence over circulars in interpreting and applying tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>