<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 658 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392214</link>
    <description>The High Court refused to interfere with the assessment order due to the belated challenge and lack of cooperation by the deceased petitioner. Despite opportunities, no fresh evidence was provided. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing the statutory remedy of appeal and seeking condonation of delay. The dismissal of the writ appeal does not prevent the appellants from challenging the assessment through the proper appellate process if an appeal is admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:32:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 658 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392214</link>
      <description>The High Court refused to interfere with the assessment order due to the belated challenge and lack of cooperation by the deceased petitioner. Despite opportunities, no fresh evidence was provided. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing the statutory remedy of appeal and seeking condonation of delay. The dismissal of the writ appeal does not prevent the appellants from challenging the assessment through the proper appellate process if an appeal is admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>