<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 645 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392201</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the revocation of the petitioner&#039;s license due to the issuance of the Show Cause Notice beyond the 90-day limitation prescribed in Regulation 20 of the Customs Brokers License Regulation, 2014. Relying on precedents, the Court deemed the limitation as mandatory, following the decisions of the Madras High Court. The Writ Petition was allowed, with no costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 645 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392201</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the revocation of the petitioner&#039;s license due to the issuance of the Show Cause Notice beyond the 90-day limitation prescribed in Regulation 20 of the Customs Brokers License Regulation, 2014. Relying on precedents, the Court deemed the limitation as mandatory, following the decisions of the Madras High Court. The Writ Petition was allowed, with no costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>