<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Accused&#039;s Claim of Cheque as Security Due to Insufficient Evidence; Reissued After Dishonored Cheques.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51785</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - The story put forward by the accused that the cheques were given by way of security is not believable in absence of further evidence to rebut the presumption and more particularly the cheque in question was issued for the second time, after the earlier cheques were dishonoured.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:20:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Accused&#039;s Claim of Cheque as Security Due to Insufficient Evidence; Reissued After Dishonored Cheques.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51785</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - The story put forward by the accused that the cheques were given by way of security is not believable in absence of further evidence to rebut the presumption and more particularly the cheque in question was issued for the second time, after the earlier cheques were dishonoured.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:20:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>