<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an Order-in-Original related to clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods without duty payment. Due to lack of detailed reasoning and scrutiny of evidence in the Commissioner&#039;s order, the Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh examination of evidence and a reasoned decision-making process, emphasizing the importance of thorough analysis and reasoning in legal judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an Order-in-Original related to clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods without duty payment. Due to lack of detailed reasoning and scrutiny of evidence in the Commissioner&#039;s order, the Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh examination of evidence and a reasoned decision-making process, emphasizing the importance of thorough analysis and reasoning in legal judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>