<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 623 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392179</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the availing of Cenvat Credit based on endorsed invoices for cooling tower components manufactured on a job work basis. However, a dispute arose regarding the refund of a deposited amount and the debited Cenvat Credit amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed that the debited amount should be credited back to the Cenvat Credit account only. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further verification concerning the utilization of the debited credit and the implications of GST transitional credit provisions. The appeal was allowed for additional examination and clarification on the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 623 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392179</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the availing of Cenvat Credit based on endorsed invoices for cooling tower components manufactured on a job work basis. However, a dispute arose regarding the refund of a deposited amount and the debited Cenvat Credit amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed that the debited amount should be credited back to the Cenvat Credit account only. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further verification concerning the utilization of the debited credit and the implications of GST transitional credit provisions. The appeal was allowed for additional examination and clarification on the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>