<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1773 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286168</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC upheld the Ethanol Blended Petrol programme and administered ethanol pricing as a valid exercise of executive power, since the policy was framed in public interest and no constitutional or statutory prohibition was shown. The absence of a separate statute did not invalidate the scheme where the Union acted within its constitutional sphere. The Court also rejected arbitrariness challenges, holding that judicial review does not extend to reassessing the wisdom or economic desirability of policy, and that adverse impact on industrial users or market prices did not by itself establish illegality, mala fides, or irrationality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1773 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286168</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC upheld the Ethanol Blended Petrol programme and administered ethanol pricing as a valid exercise of executive power, since the policy was framed in public interest and no constitutional or statutory prohibition was shown. The absence of a separate statute did not invalidate the scheme where the Union acted within its constitutional sphere. The Court also rejected arbitrariness challenges, holding that judicial review does not extend to reassessing the wisdom or economic desirability of policy, and that adverse impact on industrial users or market prices did not by itself establish illegality, mala fides, or irrationality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>