https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286169 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, leave to appeal against acquittal was declined because the accused effectively rebutted the statutory presumptions under negotiable instruments law. Her evidence remained unchallenged as the complainant did not cross-examine her, and the record indicated that the earlier monetary transaction had been repaid and that the cheque was not proved to have been issued towards a subsisting liability. On a preponderance of probability, the accused discharged the burden of rebuttal, so the acquittal was treated as based on sound appreciation of evidence and no interference was warranted. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286169 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, leave to appeal against acquittal was declined because the accused effectively rebutted the statutory presumptions under negotiable instruments law. Her evidence remained unchallenged as the complainant did not cross-examine her, and the record indicated that the earlier monetary transaction had been repaid and that the cheque was not proved to have been issued towards a subsisting liability. On a preponderance of probability, the accused discharged the burden of rebuttal, so the acquittal was treated as based on sound appreciation of evidence and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286169