https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392175 The High Court addressed the rejection of the petitioner's application under Section 220(6) by the Assessing Officer, leading to bank account attachment. The court allowed the petitioner to file a stay application before the CIT (Appeals) and directed prompt consideration within two weeks. If relief is granted, any excess recovered amount must be returned. The CIT (Appeals) must issue a reasoned order on the stay application. The petition was disposed of with instructions for procedural fairness and protection of rights. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392175 The High Court addressed the rejection of the petitioner's application under Section 220(6) by the Assessing Officer, leading to bank account attachment. The court allowed the petitioner to file a stay application before the CIT (Appeals) and directed prompt consideration within two weeks. If relief is granted, any excess recovered amount must be returned. The CIT (Appeals) must issue a reasoned order on the stay application. The petition was disposed of with instructions for procedural fairness and protection of rights. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392175