<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 614 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT (A) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed the allowance of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation beyond 8 years, interpreting the provisions enacted in the Finance Act 1988-89 in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the Finance Act 2001 reinstated the original provisions regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing for unlimited carry forward without restriction on the number of years. This judgment was pronounced on 13-12-2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 614 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT (A) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed the allowance of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation beyond 8 years, interpreting the provisions enacted in the Finance Act 1988-89 in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the Finance Act 2001 reinstated the original provisions regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing for unlimited carry forward without restriction on the number of years. This judgment was pronounced on 13-12-2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>