<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 611 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392167</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in a case concerning the confiscation of Red Sanders Wood logs and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner directed the confiscation of goods from one container but refrained from doing so for goods in two other containers due to unavailability. Penalties ranging from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1.5 crores were imposed on entities involved in the illegal export of Red Sanders. The imposition of a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on one individual was questioned due to the lack of established linkage between the individual&#039;s actions and the confiscated goods. The appeal set aside the order concerning the specific appellant pending further investigations against other individuals involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 611 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392167</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in a case concerning the confiscation of Red Sanders Wood logs and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner directed the confiscation of goods from one container but refrained from doing so for goods in two other containers due to unavailability. Penalties ranging from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1.5 crores were imposed on entities involved in the illegal export of Red Sanders. The imposition of a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on one individual was questioned due to the lack of established linkage between the individual&#039;s actions and the confiscated goods. The appeal set aside the order concerning the specific appellant pending further investigations against other individuals involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>