<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 610 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392166</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) affirming the striking off of the company&#039;s name from the Register of Companies. The Tribunal directed the restoration of the company&#039;s name, emphasizing compliance requirements, including payment of costs and filing overdue returns. Despite initial doubts on the company&#039;s status as a going concern, the Tribunal considered evidence of business activities and assets, overturning the decision based on substantial assets and ongoing business operations. Compliance post-restoration was stressed, with the possibility of punitive actions by the Registrar of Companies if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 610 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392166</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) affirming the striking off of the company&#039;s name from the Register of Companies. The Tribunal directed the restoration of the company&#039;s name, emphasizing compliance requirements, including payment of costs and filing overdue returns. Despite initial doubts on the company&#039;s status as a going concern, the Tribunal considered evidence of business activities and assets, overturning the decision based on substantial assets and ongoing business operations. Compliance post-restoration was stressed, with the possibility of punitive actions by the Registrar of Companies if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>