<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392159</link>
    <description>Physical stock shortage justified duty only to the extent of the actual short quantity after excluding rusted wire coils reflected in the panchnama; the excess demand was unsustainable. Alleged suppressed production of steel ingots based on electricity consumption and holiday production entries was not proved, because a single power-consumption benchmark without corroborative evidence could not establish clandestine manufacture or removal. The apparent mismatch between statutory and private records was reconciled by job-work data, quality-control rejections and different record purposes, so suppressed production was not established. Credit on zinc inputs could not be denied merely on consumption comparisons where receipt of duty-paid inputs under proper documents was undisputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392159</link>
      <description>Physical stock shortage justified duty only to the extent of the actual short quantity after excluding rusted wire coils reflected in the panchnama; the excess demand was unsustainable. Alleged suppressed production of steel ingots based on electricity consumption and holiday production entries was not proved, because a single power-consumption benchmark without corroborative evidence could not establish clandestine manufacture or removal. The apparent mismatch between statutory and private records was reconciled by job-work data, quality-control rejections and different record purposes, so suppressed production was not established. Credit on zinc inputs could not be denied merely on consumption comparisons where receipt of duty-paid inputs under proper documents was undisputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>