<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 558 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392114</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The corporate guarantee provided by the assessee to its subsidiaries was not considered an international transaction for Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment purposes. The adjustment proposed on interest receivables was deleted as no separate benchmark was required, and the ALP adjustment on the sale of instant coffee was deemed unjustified. The tribunal found no profit shifting to the associated enterprise and concluded that the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions were consistent with previous rulings and the case facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 558 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392114</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The corporate guarantee provided by the assessee to its subsidiaries was not considered an international transaction for Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment purposes. The adjustment proposed on interest receivables was deleted as no separate benchmark was required, and the ALP adjustment on the sale of instant coffee was deemed unjustified. The tribunal found no profit shifting to the associated enterprise and concluded that the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions were consistent with previous rulings and the case facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>