<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (2) TMI 107 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286131</link>
    <description>Section 13 CPC gives conclusiveness to a foreign judgment only on matters directly adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction and only within the statutory exceptions. A determination of title to immovable property is confined to the property situated within that court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, because rights in immovables are governed by the lex situs. The distinction between res judicata under Section 11 and conclusiveness of foreign judgments under Section 13 means a foreign decision on land outside the present suit&#039;s situs cannot bar fresh adjudication on the merits. The foreign judgment was therefore not conclusive as to the suit property and did not operate as res judicata.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (2) TMI 107 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286131</link>
      <description>Section 13 CPC gives conclusiveness to a foreign judgment only on matters directly adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction and only within the statutory exceptions. A determination of title to immovable property is confined to the property situated within that court&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, because rights in immovables are governed by the lex situs. The distinction between res judicata under Section 11 and conclusiveness of foreign judgments under Section 13 means a foreign decision on land outside the present suit&#039;s situs cannot bar fresh adjudication on the merits. The foreign judgment was therefore not conclusive as to the suit property and did not operate as res judicata.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>