<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 552 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING - UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392108</link>
    <description>The ruling authority disposed of the application for advance ruling due to the lack of essential documentation, including inconsistencies in the amount recovered from employees and unclear information on free parking slot allocation. Without necessary documents like the rent agreement and financial transaction trail, the ruling could not be issued on whether the parking charges constitute a supply of service taxable under GST. The applicant&#039;s arguments regarding parking facilitation not being integral to their software development business were considered in light of definitions under the CGST Act, but the ruling was inconclusive without proper documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 552 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING - UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392108</link>
      <description>The ruling authority disposed of the application for advance ruling due to the lack of essential documentation, including inconsistencies in the amount recovered from employees and unclear information on free parking slot allocation. Without necessary documents like the rent agreement and financial transaction trail, the ruling could not be issued on whether the parking charges constitute a supply of service taxable under GST. The applicant&#039;s arguments regarding parking facilitation not being integral to their software development business were considered in light of definitions under the CGST Act, but the ruling was inconclusive without proper documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>