<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 543 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392099</link>
    <description>Order XII Rule 6 CPC permits a decree on admission only where the admission is clear, categorical, unconditional and unequivocal; where pleadings raise a bona fide dispute over whether properties are self-acquired or acquired from joint family or business funds, summary deletion from a partition schedule is inappropriate. The limitation plea under Article 58 of the Limitation Act was also not capable of final determination at this stage, because the declaration claim was integral to the partition dispute and depended on facts concerning exclusion from joint family property. The summary relief application was therefore rejected, and issues of title, joint family character, and limitation were left for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 543 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392099</link>
      <description>Order XII Rule 6 CPC permits a decree on admission only where the admission is clear, categorical, unconditional and unequivocal; where pleadings raise a bona fide dispute over whether properties are self-acquired or acquired from joint family or business funds, summary deletion from a partition schedule is inappropriate. The limitation plea under Article 58 of the Limitation Act was also not capable of final determination at this stage, because the declaration claim was integral to the partition dispute and depended on facts concerning exclusion from joint family property. The summary relief application was therefore rejected, and issues of title, joint family character, and limitation were left for trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>