https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286118 The court found the appellant not guilty of wilful disobedience in a contempt case where the appellant registered a complaint allegedly contrary to a court statement. The court emphasized the need for intentional, conscious, and deliberate actions to establish contempt, noting that inadvertent mistakes do not constitute contempt. Procedural irregularities were deemed irrelevant, and the court set aside the contempt order, allowing one appeal and closing another. The court highlighted the limited jurisdiction in contempt cases and the necessity for judicious use of contempt powers. en-us Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286118 The court found the appellant not guilty of wilful disobedience in a contempt case where the appellant registered a complaint allegedly contrary to a court statement. The court emphasized the need for intentional, conscious, and deliberate actions to establish contempt, noting that inadvertent mistakes do not constitute contempt. Procedural irregularities were deemed irrelevant, and the court set aside the contempt order, allowing one appeal and closing another. The court highlighted the limited jurisdiction in contempt cases and the necessity for judicious use of contempt powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286118