<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 535 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392091</link>
    <description>The Authority rejected the application for advance ruling, stating it was non-maintainable under the GST Act, 2017, and related Rules. The decision was based on the jurisdictional limitations of the Authority, as it lacked the jurisdiction to rule on questions related to the determination of the place of supply of goods or services, as per legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 535 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392091</link>
      <description>The Authority rejected the application for advance ruling, stating it was non-maintainable under the GST Act, 2017, and related Rules. The decision was based on the jurisdictional limitations of the Authority, as it lacked the jurisdiction to rule on questions related to the determination of the place of supply of goods or services, as per legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>