<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 534 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392090</link>
    <description>The applicant voluntarily withdrew their application seeking an advance ruling on the applicability of a notification barring refund on parts supplied to railway supplies under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act and MGST Act. The Authority for Advance Ruling allowed the withdrawal without delving into the merits of the case. The judgment did not address the substantive issue due to the withdrawal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 534 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392090</link>
      <description>The applicant voluntarily withdrew their application seeking an advance ruling on the applicability of a notification barring refund on parts supplied to railway supplies under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act and MGST Act. The Authority for Advance Ruling allowed the withdrawal without delving into the merits of the case. The judgment did not address the substantive issue due to the withdrawal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>