https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392084 The High Court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's application for provisional release of detained goods within eight weeks, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, criticizing the practice of writ courts directing release of seized goods when provisions for provisional release exist. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and government policies, ensuring a fair resolution for the petitioner regarding the detained goods. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392084 The High Court directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's application for provisional release of detained goods within eight weeks, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, criticizing the practice of writ courts directing release of seized goods when provisions for provisional release exist. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and government policies, ensuring a fair resolution for the petitioner regarding the detained goods. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392084