<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 519 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392075</link>
    <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s application for permission to travel abroad and stay of the lookout circular, citing allegations of tax evasion, lack of cooperation during the investigation, and the strong apprehension that the petitioner might not return if allowed to travel. The court emphasized the ongoing investigation and the petitioner&#039;s role within the Words Window Group, leading to the denial of the travel request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 519 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392075</link>
      <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s application for permission to travel abroad and stay of the lookout circular, citing allegations of tax evasion, lack of cooperation during the investigation, and the strong apprehension that the petitioner might not return if allowed to travel. The court emphasized the ongoing investigation and the petitioner&#039;s role within the Words Window Group, leading to the denial of the travel request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>