https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392073 The court refrained from addressing the challenge to the constitutional validity of certain provisions at the present moment but indicated potential future consideration. Notice was issued to respondents to resolve the highlighted controversy. The court clarified that the pendency of the writ-application should not hinder the appeal process. Additionally, the court urged the appellant authority to promptly adjudicate the appeal. The judgment demonstrates a systematic approach to address the issues raised, emphasizing procedural efficiency and timely resolution of disputes. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392073 The court refrained from addressing the challenge to the constitutional validity of certain provisions at the present moment but indicated potential future consideration. Notice was issued to respondents to resolve the highlighted controversy. The court clarified that the pendency of the writ-application should not hinder the appeal process. Additionally, the court urged the appellant authority to promptly adjudicate the appeal. The judgment demonstrates a systematic approach to address the issues raised, emphasizing procedural efficiency and timely resolution of disputes. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392073