<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 515 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392071</link>
    <description>Processing of marine products by washing, grading, de-skinning, removal of inedible portions, treatment with permitted additives and preservatives, glazing, freezing and packing was treated as manufacture because it rendered the product marketable and commercially distinct under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act and Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 16 of the Tariff Act. On that basis, the activity was not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service under the Finance Act, 1994. The related service tax demand on renting of immovable property also did not survive in light of the principal manufacture finding and the threshold position. The service tax demands and penalties were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 515 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392071</link>
      <description>Processing of marine products by washing, grading, de-skinning, removal of inedible portions, treatment with permitted additives and preservatives, glazing, freezing and packing was treated as manufacture because it rendered the product marketable and commercially distinct under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act and Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 16 of the Tariff Act. On that basis, the activity was not taxable as Business Auxiliary Service under the Finance Act, 1994. The related service tax demand on renting of immovable property also did not survive in light of the principal manufacture finding and the threshold position. The service tax demands and penalties were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>