<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392062</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete interest levied under section 234B by the Ld. AO. The ITAT concluded that interest should not be imposed for shortfalls in advance tax payments resulting from retrospective amendments, as these were unforeseeable at the time of tax estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392062</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete interest levied under section 234B by the Ld. AO. The ITAT concluded that interest should not be imposed for shortfalls in advance tax payments resulting from retrospective amendments, as these were unforeseeable at the time of tax estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>