<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 503 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the exclusion of certain comparables and deleting the addition made on account of the adjustment to the arm&#039;s length price of corporate fees. The issues concerning interest under sections 234B and 234C were deemed consequential, and the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was considered premature and did not require adjudication at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:10:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 503 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the exclusion of certain comparables and deleting the addition made on account of the adjustment to the arm&#039;s length price of corporate fees. The issues concerning interest under sections 234B and 234C were deemed consequential, and the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was considered premature and did not require adjudication at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>