<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 12 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21367</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,32,750 and cancel the penalty of Rs. 35,000 under section 271(1)(c). The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions were not supported by the evidence, determining that the amounts in question represented profits rather than liabilities. Consequently, the High Court held that the penalty was justified, and the Revenue was entitled to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:48:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 12 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21367</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,32,750 and cancel the penalty of Rs. 35,000 under section 271(1)(c). The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions were not supported by the evidence, determining that the amounts in question represented profits rather than liabilities. Consequently, the High Court held that the penalty was justified, and the Revenue was entitled to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>