https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392038 The HC held the designated authority's anti-dumping determination defective: treating key figures (normal value, export price, margin of dumping, non-injurious price) as absolutely confidential and not disclosing them before hearing violated principles of natural justice and Rules 6(8), 7, 8 and 16 of the ADR Rules. The procedure was arbitrary and discriminatory for discarding interested parties' information without verifying accuracy. The court found the intervener could be treated as domestic industry only by a non-arbitrary exercise of discretion, noted problematic effects of fixing ADD in USD without addressing exchange-rate fluctuations, and held the writ petition maintainable despite an alternative appeal; the matter was sent back for reconsideration. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392038 The HC held the designated authority's anti-dumping determination defective: treating key figures (normal value, export price, margin of dumping, non-injurious price) as absolutely confidential and not disclosing them before hearing violated principles of natural justice and Rules 6(8), 7, 8 and 16 of the ADR Rules. The procedure was arbitrary and discriminatory for discarding interested parties' information without verifying accuracy. The court found the intervener could be treated as domestic industry only by a non-arbitrary exercise of discretion, noted problematic effects of fixing ADD in USD without addressing exchange-rate fluctuations, and held the writ petition maintainable despite an alternative appeal; the matter was sent back for reconsideration. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392038