https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392017 The Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's claim for exemption under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court quashed the impugned order, remitted the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration within three months, and emphasized that any delays in the process would not be tolerated. The Court found fault with the rejection based on non-e-filing of Form-10, noting that e-filing was not mandatory for the relevant assessment year and that the respondents could have guided the petitioner on the correct procedure. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392017 The Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's claim for exemption under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court quashed the impugned order, remitted the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration within three months, and emphasized that any delays in the process would not be tolerated. The Court found fault with the rejection based on non-e-filing of Form-10, noting that e-filing was not mandatory for the relevant assessment year and that the respondents could have guided the petitioner on the correct procedure. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392017