<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and AO, concluding that the business of the assessee was not set up during the relevant period, as the necessary IRDA license was only granted in February 2012. Therefore, the expenses incurred prior to this date were correctly treated as preoperative expenses and capitalized. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and AO, concluding that the business of the assessee was not set up during the relevant period, as the necessary IRDA license was only granted in February 2012. Therefore, the expenses incurred prior to this date were correctly treated as preoperative expenses and capitalized. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>