https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392009 The appeal for restoration, dismissed for non-prosecution, faced challenges due to the appellant's failure to appear on specified dates and the lack of a specific provision for restoration under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Despite the delay in filing the restoration application and mischievous filing allegations, the appellant sought restoration citing pending main cases before the Tribunal and the need to avoid frustration of the case. The application for stay on property vacation was dismissed as possession had already been taken, with the order allowing restoration of the appeal upon payment of costs within a specified timeframe. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:56:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392009 The appeal for restoration, dismissed for non-prosecution, faced challenges due to the appellant's failure to appear on specified dates and the lack of a specific provision for restoration under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Despite the delay in filing the restoration application and mischievous filing allegations, the appellant sought restoration citing pending main cases before the Tribunal and the need to avoid frustration of the case. The application for stay on property vacation was dismissed as possession had already been taken, with the order allowing restoration of the appeal upon payment of costs within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392009