<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for Denovo Adjudication regarding a dispute over Service Tax. The appellant, a Service Provider, contested a reduced demand of ? 14,67,041 out of an initial demand of ? 59,63,602. The disputed amount of ? 10,79,223 included charges for storage and warehousing of agricultural produce, renting of godown space, and handling of agricultural produce. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of agreements and invoices to accurately determine the nature of services provided, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed. The appeal was allowed for further examination and adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for Denovo Adjudication regarding a dispute over Service Tax. The appellant, a Service Provider, contested a reduced demand of ? 14,67,041 out of an initial demand of ? 59,63,602. The disputed amount of ? 10,79,223 included charges for storage and warehousing of agricultural produce, renting of godown space, and handling of agricultural produce. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of agreements and invoices to accurately determine the nature of services provided, ensuring principles of natural justice were followed. The appeal was allowed for further examination and adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>