<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392005</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the partial denial of rebate claims on services were dismissed as not maintainable by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s contention that the appeals were limited to rebate claims was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the claims fell outside its jurisdiction. Emphasizing the need to approach the Revisional Authority for such matters, the Tribunal directed the appeals to be returned. The final decision was pronounced on 30.01.2020, dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392005</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the partial denial of rebate claims on services were dismissed as not maintainable by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s contention that the appeals were limited to rebate claims was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the claims fell outside its jurisdiction. Emphasizing the need to approach the Revisional Authority for such matters, the Tribunal directed the appeals to be returned. The final decision was pronounced on 30.01.2020, dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>