https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392001 The Tribunal recognized the error in only disposing of four appeals instead of all five filed by M/s Kasegaon Education Society. The original authority's de novo adjudication was limited to four disputes, but the Tribunal directed all five to be considered for disposal. Rather than ruling on the de novo order's correctness, the Tribunal included all five appeals in the common order to maintain the appellate hierarchy. The rectification applications were resolved during the proceedings. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:55:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392001 The Tribunal recognized the error in only disposing of four appeals instead of all five filed by M/s Kasegaon Education Society. The original authority's de novo adjudication was limited to four disputes, but the Tribunal directed all five to be considered for disposal. Rather than ruling on the de novo order's correctness, the Tribunal included all five appeals in the common order to maintain the appellate hierarchy. The rectification applications were resolved during the proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392001