<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286082</link>
    <description>Supply of goods and advances were established through regular account books, ledger extracts, invoices, admitted dealings, the debtor firm&#039;s balance-sheet acknowledgment, and an adverse inference from material defence witnesses not testifying. Book entries alone could not establish liability, but corroborative evidence proved the outstanding balance. A clear, unconditional debt acknowledgment signed by a competent partner could preserve limitation and, if made after limitation expired, operate as a promise to pay a barred debt under section 25(3) of the Contract Act. Interest on advances and supplied goods was admissible at a reasonable reduced rate, with future interest confined to principal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286082</link>
      <description>Supply of goods and advances were established through regular account books, ledger extracts, invoices, admitted dealings, the debtor firm&#039;s balance-sheet acknowledgment, and an adverse inference from material defence witnesses not testifying. Book entries alone could not establish liability, but corroborative evidence proved the outstanding balance. A clear, unconditional debt acknowledgment signed by a competent partner could preserve limitation and, if made after limitation expired, operate as a promise to pay a barred debt under section 25(3) of the Contract Act. Interest on advances and supplied goods was admissible at a reasonable reduced rate, with future interest confined to principal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>