https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286079 A statutory transfer transaction arising under the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 attracted the pre-suit notice requirement under Section 156, but substantial compliance was sufficient because the notice conveyed the grievance and relief sought, so the suit was not barred. Where the agreement for sale fixed no time for performance, the defendant's failure to execute the conveyance and deliver possession was treated as a continuing breach, and Article 55 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied; the claim was therefore within time. The Court granted specific performance by directing execution and registration of the conveyance, while leaving the issue of actual physical possession open for report and further orders. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:52:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286079 A statutory transfer transaction arising under the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 attracted the pre-suit notice requirement under Section 156, but substantial compliance was sufficient because the notice conveyed the grievance and relief sought, so the suit was not barred. Where the agreement for sale fixed no time for performance, the defendant's failure to execute the conveyance and deliver possession was treated as a continuing breach, and Article 55 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied; the claim was therefore within time. The Court granted specific performance by directing execution and registration of the conveyance, while leaving the issue of actual physical possession open for report and further orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286079