<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1438 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286074</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of the claim for carry forward and set off of deficits of earlier years under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal based on precedents set by earlier judgments, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s rulings were in line with established legal interpretations. The issues regarding the treatment of capital expenditure in the income and expenditure account were also decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1438 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286074</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of the claim for carry forward and set off of deficits of earlier years under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal based on precedents set by earlier judgments, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s rulings were in line with established legal interpretations. The issues regarding the treatment of capital expenditure in the income and expenditure account were also decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>