https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286068 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was held inapplicable to an application under Section 17(2A) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 for extension of time to deposit rent, because the special tenancy scheme prescribed its own time limit and the earlier decision in Jatindra Nath Samanta governed the issue. The Court also found that the explanation based on mistaken legal advice did not show sufficient cause, as it was unsupported and reflected negligence rather than a proper basis for condonation. The application for extension and condonation therefore failed. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:22:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286068 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was held inapplicable to an application under Section 17(2A) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 for extension of time to deposit rent, because the special tenancy scheme prescribed its own time limit and the earlier decision in Jatindra Nath Samanta governed the issue. The Court also found that the explanation based on mistaken legal advice did not show sufficient cause, as it was unsupported and reflected negligence rather than a proper basis for condonation. The application for extension and condonation therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286068