https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286066 The court dismissed the defendants' appeal application under Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the need for due diligence and good faith in prosecuting appeals. Despite citing legal precedents, the court found the appellant's filing in the wrong court lacking justification and failed to demonstrate requisite diligence or good faith. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal as time-barred, imposing costs and directing investigation into the Munsarim's oversight in reporting the appeal's incorrect jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:16:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286066 The court dismissed the defendants' appeal application under Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the need for due diligence and good faith in prosecuting appeals. Despite citing legal precedents, the court found the appellant's filing in the wrong court lacking justification and failed to demonstrate requisite diligence or good faith. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal as time-barred, imposing costs and directing investigation into the Munsarim's oversight in reporting the appeal's incorrect jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286066