https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286063 Delay in filing a civil revision was held not to be condoned where the applicant relied on alleged wrong legal advice but gave only a bare assertion without full disclosure of the circumstances showing bona fide and sufficient cause. The Court reiterated that liberal treatment in delay matters is not automatic, especially where the statutory remedy requires prompt action. It also held that revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to jurisdictional error and cannot be used for appellate reappraisal of findings on merits. No jurisdictional defect or legal infirmity in the trial court's order was shown, so interference was declined. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:05:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286063 Delay in filing a civil revision was held not to be condoned where the applicant relied on alleged wrong legal advice but gave only a bare assertion without full disclosure of the circumstances showing bona fide and sufficient cause. The Court reiterated that liberal treatment in delay matters is not automatic, especially where the statutory remedy requires prompt action. It also held that revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to jurisdictional error and cannot be used for appellate reappraisal of findings on merits. No jurisdictional defect or legal infirmity in the trial court's order was shown, so interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286063