https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21350 Where a stay has been granted against further action under Chapter XXC on a pre-emptive purchase order, the Department cannot be compelled to pay the sale consideration to the vendor while the writ proceedings remain pending. The Court followed the settled principle that public funds should not be disbursed before final adjudication and that alleged loss arising from the purchaser's conduct must be pursued against the purchaser in accordance with law, not through an interlocutory direction against the Department. Disputed questions on payment and breach were held unsuitable for resolution at the interim stage, and the stay was treated as continuing until final decision. en-us Sun, 15 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:12:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21350 Where a stay has been granted against further action under Chapter XXC on a pre-emptive purchase order, the Department cannot be compelled to pay the sale consideration to the vendor while the writ proceedings remain pending. The Court followed the settled principle that public funds should not be disbursed before final adjudication and that alleged loss arising from the purchaser's conduct must be pursued against the purchaser in accordance with law, not through an interlocutory direction against the Department. Disputed questions on payment and breach were held unsuitable for resolution at the interim stage, and the stay was treated as continuing until final decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Sun, 15 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21350