<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 424 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the addition of Rs. 80.00 lakhs under Section 68 and deleting the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 62,048. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had satisfactorily demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions and that the adhoc disallowance was not supported by specific findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 424 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the addition of Rs. 80.00 lakhs under Section 68 and deleting the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 62,048. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had satisfactorily demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions and that the adhoc disallowance was not supported by specific findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>