<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391973</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing one issue to be restored to the AO for verification based on necessary evidence, emphasizing principles of natural justice. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on other issues due to lack of evidence, including failure to establish a dispute leading to an arbitration award and non-residents&#039; services used for sales outside India. The disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) were deleted as the Assessing Officer did not prove violations of relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391973</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing one issue to be restored to the AO for verification based on necessary evidence, emphasizing principles of natural justice. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on other issues due to lack of evidence, including failure to establish a dispute leading to an arbitration award and non-residents&#039; services used for sales outside India. The disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) were deleted as the Assessing Officer did not prove violations of relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>