<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 9,46,73,015/- representing discount on buy-back of FCCB was a capital receipt and not taxable. The disallowance of business expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The specific disallowance under section 194C read with section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 9,46,73,015/- representing discount on buy-back of FCCB was a capital receipt and not taxable. The disallowance of business expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The specific disallowance under section 194C read with section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>