<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 410 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391966</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of a petition challenging the validity of provisions related to the levy of service tax on services in non-taxable territories. The court referenced a prior decision that had declared certain notifications ultra vires, leading to the quashing of proceedings for collecting service tax on sea transportation services in CIF contracts. The petition was disposed of based on the earlier judgment, indirectly addressing the issues raised in the present case regarding the legality of levying service tax on imported goods&#039; freight payments and the validity of specific notifications and circulars. The outcome of the refund request for the service tax amount was not explicitly stated but would likely be impacted by the overarching declaration of certain notifications as ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 410 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391966</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of a petition challenging the validity of provisions related to the levy of service tax on services in non-taxable territories. The court referenced a prior decision that had declared certain notifications ultra vires, leading to the quashing of proceedings for collecting service tax on sea transportation services in CIF contracts. The petition was disposed of based on the earlier judgment, indirectly addressing the issues raised in the present case regarding the legality of levying service tax on imported goods&#039; freight payments and the validity of specific notifications and circulars. The outcome of the refund request for the service tax amount was not explicitly stated but would likely be impacted by the overarching declaration of certain notifications as ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>